Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Bangkit dengan semangat membara- Presiden PAS
"Teruskanlah gerak kerja jentera parti di seluruh negeri Perak dan negara, dan bangkitlah dengan semangat baru yang membara untuk meneruskan cita-cita perjuangan PAS selama ini,"Harakahdaily
KUALA LUMPUR, 10 Feb : Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang mengarahkan jentera parti seluruh negara dan negeri Perak supaya meneruskan gerak kerja dan bangkit dengan semangat baru yang membara ekoran keputusan mahkamah persekutuan semalam.
"Teruskanlah gerak kerja jentera parti di seluruh negeri Perak dan negara, dan bangkitlah dengan semangat baru yang membara untuk meneruskan cita-cita perjuangan PAS selama ini," katanya dalam satu kenyataan ringkas kepada Harakahdaily.
PAS jelasnya berpandangan walaupun keputusan mahkamah tidak menyebelahi Pakatan Rakyat, namun yakin rakyat negeri Perak masih dan akan terus bersama dengan kepimpinan Pakatan Rakyat yang diterajui Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin.
Ianya kerana kepimpinan Pakatan Rakyat sememangnya telah dipilih secara sah oleh rakyat negeri itu menerusi proses pilihanraya umum ke-12 lalu.
Episod hitam ini juga diingatkan jangan sesekali melemahkan semangat juang seluruh kepimpinan PAS negeri itu.
"PAS juga menyeru kepada seluruh peringkat kepimpinan PAS di negeri Perak khususnya, dan di seluruh negara amnya agar tidak menjadikan episod hitam ini sebagai alasan yang dapat melemahkan semangat juang," katanya lagi.
Beliau turut mengingatkan kepada seluruh rakyat Perak agar bertenang dan tidak terlibat dalam sebarang provokasi yang mungkin dicetuskan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu.
"Pihak kepimpinan tertinggi PAS pula akan berbincang dalam masa terdekat ini untuk mengambil langkah strategik yang perlu dalam menghadapi suasana ini," katanya.
Dayak helpless mentality leads to Dayak failure
illustration photo : thenutgraphDayakBaru.com Written by Dr. John Brian Anthony
Racialist
The UMNO Malay are using the term bumiputera to gain business quota. The UMNO Malay could not even care less that the term bumiputera includes the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Why should they malaya Malay care?
The Dayak politicians are participating in BN and the Dayak voted for BN because BN has drilled into the Dayak that BN would bring progress to Dayak. We all know that till today such promise has not been met by BN.
The Dayak YBs has been bribed and bought by Ketuanan Melayu. The Malay has NO feeling what so ever over the lack of development for the Dayak both physical and mental. The lack of education among Dayak is not helping out to hasten the change. By the time the Dayak realize what is going on Dayak would have been the poorest community in Malaysia.
The Dayak YBs felt that they are doing their best
What is their best – do anyone of you know it. In Sarawak if the Dayak do not participate in forming he government that government would have no standing. Some dayak YBs choose to be bought and get rich rather then to stand for Dayak rights. Are we running the Dayak leaders down? In a way we are because they have not shown any effectiveness in improving the livelihood of the Dayak within SARAWAK.
Hey, why blame the YB. The YB are frustrated with Dayak who cannot even pull themselves together and be able to initiate small things to help themselves. Why bother with “monkey” Dayak – it is better to get rich personally through political position and connection. Let the Dayak with helpless mentality be where they are as they choose to be.
The fault lies with ourselves
Not many Dayakbaru would even part with their money to contribute towards building a Dayak college. Dayak do not see contributing money to Dayak cause a priority. The educated Dayak – many who earn big salary may not part with their money.We did not realize that we have a “behavior and thinking” that we always expect others to do things for us. We seldom take it upon ourselves to take responsibility to bring progress to our community through Dayak organization.
We always think that those people who are asking for donation to help dayak NGO programs are going to CHEAT us. We simply do not feel for the effort of other Dayak who is trying to help the community. That is selfish – ego centric attitude which will be a major hindrance to our community progress.
Dayak land rights and lossess
Look at the plight of Tr. Nor. Some even argued that because BN pull down the long house it is the government responsibility to help them rebuild their long house. That is “helpless” thinking. It is helpless because we cannot begin to learn to help ourselves as a community. We live in big community but we do not know how to develop the community to be more effective and successful.
What we can do is to come positively forward to assist with any material means. Knowing that we are not close to Tr. Nor, how many of you contributed to the fund. I have the figures but if needed be I would disclosed the amount.
If Dayakbaru cannot part with $10.00 and give a million excuses for such money to be given to help Dayak cause – Dayakbaru helpless mentality in itself is the cause of Dayak failure. We identify unity as an important factor for our community to succeed but we as individual could not deliver our own commitment. That is sad but true.
We cannot wait to be told to donate. We must take the land issue and the oppression by the government seriously. Now, i do not wonder why BN is always winning despite so many Dayak disagreeing with unjust government policy. We are too helpless to help ourselves – urban Dayak included.
To Dayak donating money – is taboo.
Everytime a Dayak donate money heis first thought is someone is going to cheat him of his money. Therefor any effort to bring together the creation of fund for any Dayak cause is doom to fail. Giving out money for a cause is so painful to Dayak. They give you $10.00 today, the Dayak will expect the result tomorrow and remember the donation for years to come. Most educated Dayak are the same in their mentality. This is where Change WE Must. But if it giving to the church that is quite acceptable but any program to help out Dayak NGO initiative would not touch the soul of Dayak.
Why is this Dr. sounded very angry
I am totally disappointed with the attitude of many Dayaks. We wanted the SKY but we cannot even give out $0.10cents. That speaks loud and clear with our ability to understand that in order to progress we must know how to invest. Investing in community project and financing ourselves to work for community NGO is like the holy grail for dayak – including Dayakbaru.
If educated Dayak with stable income cannot part with $10.00 per year to support dayak NGO community program that would be a major problem that we must change in ourselves.
Dayak Community College Fund
Let me begin by saying that a Community College owned and run by Dayak – in the name of Sarawak Dayak National Union is proposed, how many of you would agree that the college is important for Dayak. If you feel that it is important to Dayak – would you contribute to SDNU Dayak College Fund?
I do not want to see your money. I want to see your pledge to the fund. You can pledge to the fund by writing to dayakbaru@gmail.com. State the amount that you would give – BUT send NO MONEY. We do not have license or approval to collect public money. I want to see your pledge NOT your money yet. I want to see how many of you take the trouble to write an email to pledge. If the initial pledge reach $100,000.00 (One Hundred thousand only) then I can see hope to push forward for the project to start a Dayak Community college.
What detail do you need to know before you pledge?
There is no detail of the plan. I wanted to know whether it is even worth to start working on the plan with such a project. If we cannot pledge / promise to donate a certain amount – we will get much less money. Do you think Dayakbaru should wait for the government to donate to us some money first before we can have a Dayak college?
I want to see changes in our commitment to something to be translated to action. We want to cahnge the government but we did not take the trouble to register ourselves as voters. We feel strongly about improving the life of dayak in the long house but we do not do anything – run any program, have a plan to educate the rural folks on issues – we wait for others to do the work for us. Is that a winning mentality – it is not.
Involvement in Dayak NGO
“Lak ke kita meh dulu”. Let others join the NGO first. Do you know the meaning of your own words. It is simple. I am not prepare / not willing to contribute to the Dayak to do work and contribute to Dayak community. We have to take some responsibility upon ourselves to help move bthe Dayak community forward.
Helping the community is not limited to politics only. We must be involved in community development through participation in NGOs and personal initiative. We need to see beyond the front door of our home and make it a point to contribute to improve our community through any means practicable to you.
Dayak inability to participate in community work and lack of interest to be part of Dayak NGO work is some of the key reason why we are not progressing well.
LOOK AT THE MIRROR – and say I want to make that change for Dayak progress. Do it!
Racialist
The UMNO Malay are using the term bumiputera to gain business quota. The UMNO Malay could not even care less that the term bumiputera includes the natives of Sabah and Sarawak. Why should they malaya Malay care?
The Dayak politicians are participating in BN and the Dayak voted for BN because BN has drilled into the Dayak that BN would bring progress to Dayak. We all know that till today such promise has not been met by BN.
The Dayak YBs has been bribed and bought by Ketuanan Melayu. The Malay has NO feeling what so ever over the lack of development for the Dayak both physical and mental. The lack of education among Dayak is not helping out to hasten the change. By the time the Dayak realize what is going on Dayak would have been the poorest community in Malaysia.
The Dayak YBs felt that they are doing their best
What is their best – do anyone of you know it. In Sarawak if the Dayak do not participate in forming he government that government would have no standing. Some dayak YBs choose to be bought and get rich rather then to stand for Dayak rights. Are we running the Dayak leaders down? In a way we are because they have not shown any effectiveness in improving the livelihood of the Dayak within SARAWAK.
Hey, why blame the YB. The YB are frustrated with Dayak who cannot even pull themselves together and be able to initiate small things to help themselves. Why bother with “monkey” Dayak – it is better to get rich personally through political position and connection. Let the Dayak with helpless mentality be where they are as they choose to be.
The fault lies with ourselves
Not many Dayakbaru would even part with their money to contribute towards building a Dayak college. Dayak do not see contributing money to Dayak cause a priority. The educated Dayak – many who earn big salary may not part with their money.We did not realize that we have a “behavior and thinking” that we always expect others to do things for us. We seldom take it upon ourselves to take responsibility to bring progress to our community through Dayak organization.
We always think that those people who are asking for donation to help dayak NGO programs are going to CHEAT us. We simply do not feel for the effort of other Dayak who is trying to help the community. That is selfish – ego centric attitude which will be a major hindrance to our community progress.
Dayak land rights and lossess
Look at the plight of Tr. Nor. Some even argued that because BN pull down the long house it is the government responsibility to help them rebuild their long house. That is “helpless” thinking. It is helpless because we cannot begin to learn to help ourselves as a community. We live in big community but we do not know how to develop the community to be more effective and successful.
What we can do is to come positively forward to assist with any material means. Knowing that we are not close to Tr. Nor, how many of you contributed to the fund. I have the figures but if needed be I would disclosed the amount.
If Dayakbaru cannot part with $10.00 and give a million excuses for such money to be given to help Dayak cause – Dayakbaru helpless mentality in itself is the cause of Dayak failure. We identify unity as an important factor for our community to succeed but we as individual could not deliver our own commitment. That is sad but true.
We cannot wait to be told to donate. We must take the land issue and the oppression by the government seriously. Now, i do not wonder why BN is always winning despite so many Dayak disagreeing with unjust government policy. We are too helpless to help ourselves – urban Dayak included.
To Dayak donating money – is taboo.
Everytime a Dayak donate money heis first thought is someone is going to cheat him of his money. Therefor any effort to bring together the creation of fund for any Dayak cause is doom to fail. Giving out money for a cause is so painful to Dayak. They give you $10.00 today, the Dayak will expect the result tomorrow and remember the donation for years to come. Most educated Dayak are the same in their mentality. This is where Change WE Must. But if it giving to the church that is quite acceptable but any program to help out Dayak NGO initiative would not touch the soul of Dayak.
Why is this Dr. sounded very angry
I am totally disappointed with the attitude of many Dayaks. We wanted the SKY but we cannot even give out $0.10cents. That speaks loud and clear with our ability to understand that in order to progress we must know how to invest. Investing in community project and financing ourselves to work for community NGO is like the holy grail for dayak – including Dayakbaru.
If educated Dayak with stable income cannot part with $10.00 per year to support dayak NGO community program that would be a major problem that we must change in ourselves.
Dayak Community College Fund
Let me begin by saying that a Community College owned and run by Dayak – in the name of Sarawak Dayak National Union is proposed, how many of you would agree that the college is important for Dayak. If you feel that it is important to Dayak – would you contribute to SDNU Dayak College Fund?
I do not want to see your money. I want to see your pledge to the fund. You can pledge to the fund by writing to dayakbaru@gmail.com. State the amount that you would give – BUT send NO MONEY. We do not have license or approval to collect public money. I want to see your pledge NOT your money yet. I want to see how many of you take the trouble to write an email to pledge. If the initial pledge reach $100,000.00 (One Hundred thousand only) then I can see hope to push forward for the project to start a Dayak Community college.
What detail do you need to know before you pledge?
There is no detail of the plan. I wanted to know whether it is even worth to start working on the plan with such a project. If we cannot pledge / promise to donate a certain amount – we will get much less money. Do you think Dayakbaru should wait for the government to donate to us some money first before we can have a Dayak college?
I want to see changes in our commitment to something to be translated to action. We want to cahnge the government but we did not take the trouble to register ourselves as voters. We feel strongly about improving the life of dayak in the long house but we do not do anything – run any program, have a plan to educate the rural folks on issues – we wait for others to do the work for us. Is that a winning mentality – it is not.
Involvement in Dayak NGO
“Lak ke kita meh dulu”. Let others join the NGO first. Do you know the meaning of your own words. It is simple. I am not prepare / not willing to contribute to the Dayak to do work and contribute to Dayak community. We have to take some responsibility upon ourselves to help move bthe Dayak community forward.
Helping the community is not limited to politics only. We must be involved in community development through participation in NGOs and personal initiative. We need to see beyond the front door of our home and make it a point to contribute to improve our community through any means practicable to you.
Dayak inability to participate in community work and lack of interest to be part of Dayak NGO work is some of the key reason why we are not progressing well.
LOOK AT THE MIRROR – and say I want to make that change for Dayak progress. Do it!
Bumiputera, Melayu, Dayak, KadazanDusun and 1Malaysia
In Malaysia racialist politics, politicians often create all sort of terms out of nothing – but for political gains. Just look at how the term ‘Bumiputera’ being bandied around.In simple term it means Melayu + KadazanDusun + Dayak = Bumiputera
But it usages and meaning often dictates by the political stage. Now let’s look at when Bumiputera being used.
(1) political rally - where the audience could be mixed of Iban, Bidayuh, Orang Ulu etc. BN Politicians will ” Saya, kita orang BUMIPUTERA”
(2) Political bargaining – ie., when UMNO try to negotiate with MCA, MIC, Gerakan for something, they say “look Samy, Tee Keat, Tsu Koon – kita orang Bumiputera di Malaysia melebihi 70 peratus penduduk, India hanya kurang 9 peratus, Cina hanya lebih kurang 18.9 peratus’. The Indian, Chinese leaders agreed and nodded.
This lead to UMNO politicians got the biggest chunks of gomen contracts – it’s likely none goes to another Bumiputera in Sabah and Sarawak. But when they make noise, as they occasionally do, UMNO would give mere 0.005 per cent of what they get. However, that’s more than enough to satisfied the Bumiputera in Sarawak. Why not – 0.005 of a multi-billion projects to only one person!
When not to use Bumiputera
(1) When there is policy making, closed door meetings. At a particular meeting I attended few years back – the chairman said “Ini agenda negara, agenda Melayu,” hmmm…what happen to the agenda Bumiputera? gone? I asked myself. Realizing I’m not a Malay – he suddenly said “Ini agenda Bumiputera” Wah – betul2x topeng punya orang!
This happen almost all the time in Malaya – mind you. Not so sure about Sarawak or Sabah though. So careful if heard Najib says Bumiputera – as he could mean Malayu only.
(2) Distribution of Bumiputera benefits – Iban is not recognise as Bumiputera in Melaka I came to discover in long time ago. I came to know an Iban married to a Chinese, they were residing in Melaka.
The hubby applied for to 5 percent Bumiputera status for a property, but according to Melaka state govt he was not a ‘Bumiputera’ despite being an Iban, Bumiputera in Sarawak. What happen was, In Melaka the word Bumiputera apparently mean Melayu!
Here in Sarawak Tok Uban often used the term “Orang Kita, Bangsa Kita, Kaum Kita”. Those in the state government know to whom he refers to as they even has a joke about it.
Bintulu.org
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
MB Perak: Rakyat boleh protes dengan cetus kebencian, kata Nik Aziz
Oleh Mohd Zuharman
KOTA BARU, Feb 9 — Mursyidul Am PAS Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat berkata tidak salah jika rakyat memprotes keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini yang berpihak kepada Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir dalam kes pertikaian mengenai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah.
Beliau membuat kenyataan itu merujuk kepada keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi berhubung kebenaran terhadap penggunaan kalimah Allah bagi penerbitan majalah mingguan The Herald, juga mendapat tentangan secara habis-habisan daripada kalangan pihak tertentu dengan mengadakan bermacam-macam demonstrasi baru-baru ini.
“Situasi itu adalah satu situasi baru dalam Malaysia di mana beberapa pihak tertentu bangkit menentang keputusan mahkamah dalam isu penggunaan kalimah Allah. Berdemonstrasi, lengkap dengan gambar, lengkap dengan kata-kata menentang keputusan mahkamah.
“Orang yang demonstrasi menentang keputusan itu bukan dibuat oleh sebarangan orang, orang kenamaan. Jadi situasi begini boleh ditiru oleh rakyat.
“Oleh yang demikian bila mahkamah berkeputusan memihak pada Zambry pada hari ini, maka rakyat boleh menentang keputusan ini walaupun tidak dengan demonstrasi,” katanya pada sidang media selepas mesyuarat Dewan Harian di kediaman rasminya di JKR 10 petang ini.
Sebaliknya kata Nik Aziz (gambar) penentangan itu boleh dibuat dengan cara menimbulkan rasa benci dalam hati rakyat terhadap keputusan tersebut memandangkan keupayaan Zambry menduduki kerusi nombor satu negeri Perak dianggapnya melalui proses kudeta, bukan pilihan raya.
Panel lima hakim diketuai Presiden Mahkamah Rayuan Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff membuat keputusan sebulat suara bahawa Sultan Azlan Shah telah menggunakan bidang kuasa baginda untuk melantik Zambry bagi menggantikan Nizar setelah berpuas hati Nizar tidak lagi mempunyai kelebihan undi dalam Dewan Undangan negeri.
Turut bersidang bersama Alauddin ialah Hakim Besar Malaya Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria serta hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan, Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin, Datuk Wira Ghazali Mohd Yusof dan Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong.
Mahkamah Rayuan mengisytiharkan bahawa pelantikan Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar dibuat mengikut Perlembagaan.
themalaysianinsider
KOTA BARU, Feb 9 — Mursyidul Am PAS Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat berkata tidak salah jika rakyat memprotes keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini yang berpihak kepada Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir dalam kes pertikaian mengenai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah.Beliau membuat kenyataan itu merujuk kepada keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi berhubung kebenaran terhadap penggunaan kalimah Allah bagi penerbitan majalah mingguan The Herald, juga mendapat tentangan secara habis-habisan daripada kalangan pihak tertentu dengan mengadakan bermacam-macam demonstrasi baru-baru ini.
“Situasi itu adalah satu situasi baru dalam Malaysia di mana beberapa pihak tertentu bangkit menentang keputusan mahkamah dalam isu penggunaan kalimah Allah. Berdemonstrasi, lengkap dengan gambar, lengkap dengan kata-kata menentang keputusan mahkamah.
“Orang yang demonstrasi menentang keputusan itu bukan dibuat oleh sebarangan orang, orang kenamaan. Jadi situasi begini boleh ditiru oleh rakyat.
“Oleh yang demikian bila mahkamah berkeputusan memihak pada Zambry pada hari ini, maka rakyat boleh menentang keputusan ini walaupun tidak dengan demonstrasi,” katanya pada sidang media selepas mesyuarat Dewan Harian di kediaman rasminya di JKR 10 petang ini.
Sebaliknya kata Nik Aziz (gambar) penentangan itu boleh dibuat dengan cara menimbulkan rasa benci dalam hati rakyat terhadap keputusan tersebut memandangkan keupayaan Zambry menduduki kerusi nombor satu negeri Perak dianggapnya melalui proses kudeta, bukan pilihan raya.
Panel lima hakim diketuai Presiden Mahkamah Rayuan Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff membuat keputusan sebulat suara bahawa Sultan Azlan Shah telah menggunakan bidang kuasa baginda untuk melantik Zambry bagi menggantikan Nizar setelah berpuas hati Nizar tidak lagi mempunyai kelebihan undi dalam Dewan Undangan negeri.
Turut bersidang bersama Alauddin ialah Hakim Besar Malaya Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria serta hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan, Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin, Datuk Wira Ghazali Mohd Yusof dan Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong.
Mahkamah Rayuan mengisytiharkan bahawa pelantikan Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar dibuat mengikut Perlembagaan.
themalaysianinsider
Mahkamah seperti akui rampasan kuasa di Perak – Nik Aziz
“Allah Taala menterjemahkan rasa benci-Nya terhadap manusia yang kufur serta fasik dan derhaka. Apa yang berlaku di Perak adalah kerja fasik kerana mereka menang tidak melalui pilihan raya dan pihak yang menang itu pula melompat keluar dari kerajaan yang dipilih rakyat,”Salmah Mat Husain
KOTA BHARU, 9 Feb : “Itu keputusan mahkamah seperti mengakui rampasan kuasa yang berlaku di Perak dan bukannya melalui pilihan raya,” kata Mursyidul Am PAS, Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat.
Oleh itu, beliau meminta rakyat di seluruh negara khususnya Perak memprotes sekurang-kurangnya dengan cara benci.
“Allah Taala menterjemahkan rasa benci-Nya terhadap manusia yang kufur serta fasik dan derhaka.
“Apa yang berlaku di Perak adalah kerja fasik kerana mereka menang tidak melalui pilihan raya dan pihak yang menang itu pula melompat keluar dari kerajaan yang dipilih rakyat,” katanya ketika ditemui di sini.
Beliau diminta mengulas keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan yang mengesahkan kedudukan Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir sebagai Menteri Besar Perak, selepas tiga Adun Pakatan Rakyat mengisytihar sebagai wakil rakyat Bebas tahun lepas.
Nik Abdul Aziz yang juga Menteri Besar Kelantan berkata, rakyat memprotes keputusan mahkamah kerana seolah-olah mengesahkan mereka yang melompat parti.
Katanya, perlu diperjelaskan perbuatan melompat parti sehingga menjatuhkan kerajaan Perak yang dipilih rakyat secara sah mengikut demokrasi adalah salah.
“Sekiranya keputusan mahkamah berhubung penggunaan kalimah Allah baru-baru ini diprotes pihak tertentu, tidak ada salah juga protes yang sama juga perlu dibuat berhubung kes mahkamah hari ini,” ujarnya.
Katanya, walaupun tidak menentang dengan demontrasi, namun ia boleh dilakukan dengan cara menanam rasa benci di hati rakyat berhubung perkara itu.
Kata beliau, melompat parti disifat sebagai pecah amanah rakyat yang mengundi mereka.
Tambahnya, pecah amanah sedemikian akan berulang pada masa akan datang disebabkan mereka semakin galak melakukan kerja jahat.
“Tidak mustahil huru hara akan berlaku di negara ini sekiranya tindakan galak tersebut dibiarkan berterusan,” ujarnya.
Harakahdaily
Mystery man in Altantuya saga
S D Idid
Tuesday, 09 February 2010 02:50
KUALA LUMPUR - When private investigator P Balasubramaniam made his statutory declaration in connection with the Altantuya Shariibuu murder, he mentioned ‘a man in a blue Proton Saga.’
The police claimed the man was just another resident in the Damansara Heights neighbourhood who happened to be driving pass the home of defence analyst Abdul Razak Baginda at that time, which was a day before Altantuya was reported missing on Oct 19, 2006.
Fugitive blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin, however, has alleged that the ‘mystery man’ was none other than Nasir Safar, the special advisor to the Prime Minister who recently caused a storm with his offensive remarks about the early Indian and Chinese immigrants who left their home shores to come to work and settle in Malaysia.
“Nasir has been asked to resign for calling the early Indian immigrants beggars and the Chinese prostitutes. But that is not the icing on the cake.
“The icing on the cake is that Nasir was the man mentioned in item 30 of PI Bala’s statutory declaration,” Raja Petra said in his column, Corridors of Power in the Malaysia Today news portal.
The paragraph concerned reads:
“Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.”
'Aminah' was Altantuya
To recap, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri was one of the two policemen who were tried for the murder of Altantuya, a Mongolian woman who allegedly had an affair with Abdul Razak, a defence analyst from the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.
The other cop was Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar.
‘Aminah’ was a name used by Altantuya when she came to Malaysia to look for Abdul Razak, allegedly to demand her commission for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris. The sum she had reportedly asked for was US$500,000.
Among the claims that Bala made in his statutory declaration was that Altantuya told him several things about her relationship with Abdul Razak, including meeting him with (then deputy minister) Najib Abdul Razak in Singapore. She later met them at a dinner in Paris.
Bala claimed that the Mongolian woman also told him she was promised US$500,000 as commission for assisting in the submarine deal.
She allegedly told Bala about a house that Abdul Razak bought for her and about her mother who was sick and needed money for treatment.
She had allegedly also told the private investigator that she and Abdul Razak had married in Korea.
Bala further claimed: “After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red Proton Aeroback arrived with a woman and two men.
“I now know the woman to be L/Cpl Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
“ Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
“ Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red Proton and exchanged seats so that L/Cpl Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.”
'Yes, that man was Nasir'
Raja Petra is convinced the man driving the blue car was Nasir.
“Yes, that man in the blue Proton Saga was Nasir Safar.
“But the police, who took Bala’s statement, denied it and said that it was a resident from that area and not Nasir.
“How did the police know this immediately without any further investigation and without taking Nasir’s statement?
“Now, why would the Prime Minister’s special officer be at the scene of the crime? Was it to see for himself that Altantuya is arrested and quickly disposed off?” he asked.
“Yes, the plot thickens. First it was Najib’s ADC, Musa Safri. Then it was Rosmah’s ADC, Norhayati Hassan, and her husband, Abdul Aziz Buyong.
“And now we have Nasir Safar, who drove past Razak Baginda’s house very slowly, possibly to ensure that Altantuya, who was making a nuisance of herself, is picked up.”
Raja Petra asked: “Would Najib like to challenge us on this?
“He can if he so wishes. Then, Bala’s lawyer can arrange for the witness to testify to the MACC (Malaysian AntiCorruption Commission) in London, as what they (Bala and lawyer) offered to d.
She worked as a translator
According to testimony in the trial of Abdul Razak, the murdered woman accompanied him to Paris at a time when Malaysia's Defence ministry was negotiating through a Malaysian company to buy two Scorpene submarines and a used Agosta submarine produced by the French government under a French-Spanish joint venture, Armaris.
Altantuya had reportedly worked as Abdul Razak’s translator when he was brokering for the Malaysian government
She went missing on Oct 19, 2006 and a report was lodged by her cousin,who also sought help from the Mongolian embassy in Bangkok.
The Malaysian police found fragments of bone, later verified as Altantuya’s , in forested land near the Subang Dam in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam.
Police investigation of her remains revealed that she was shot twice before C-4 explosives were used on her remains, although there has been later suggestion that the C-4 explosives may have killed her.
When her remains were found their identity could only be confirmed with DNA testing. The provenance of the C-4 remains unclear.
On Oct 31, 2008 the High Court acquitted Abdul Razak of abetment in the murder of Altantuya, with the prosecution saying they would appeal the acquittal.
However the Attorney General's office had decided not to file an appeal against Razak’s acquittal.
Verdict aftefr 159-day trial
On 14 Sept, 2009 Altantuya's father, Dr Shaariibuu Setev, withdrew his bid to force the A-G to appeal against Abdul Razak’s acquittal, after being advised that it would be a long, costly and difficult affair.[
Wrapping up the 159-day trial on April 9, 2009, High Court Judge Zaki Yasin ruled that Azilah and Sirul both guilty of murdering Altantuya and sentenced them to death.
In a statutory declaration in his sedition trial in June 2008, Raja Petra accused the PM’s wife, Rosmah Mansor of being one of three individuals who were present at the crime scene when Altantuya was murdered.
The two others allegedly present were her aide-de-camp Norhayati Hassan and her husband, Col Aziz Buyong.
Both the husband and wife are suing Raja Petra for defamation. His current whereabouts is unknown but he is believed to be abroad. - Malaysian Mirror
Tuesday, 09 February 2010 02:50
KUALA LUMPUR - When private investigator P Balasubramaniam made his statutory declaration in connection with the Altantuya Shariibuu murder, he mentioned ‘a man in a blue Proton Saga.’
The police claimed the man was just another resident in the Damansara Heights neighbourhood who happened to be driving pass the home of defence analyst Abdul Razak Baginda at that time, which was a day before Altantuya was reported missing on Oct 19, 2006.
Fugitive blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin, however, has alleged that the ‘mystery man’ was none other than Nasir Safar, the special advisor to the Prime Minister who recently caused a storm with his offensive remarks about the early Indian and Chinese immigrants who left their home shores to come to work and settle in Malaysia.
“Nasir has been asked to resign for calling the early Indian immigrants beggars and the Chinese prostitutes. But that is not the icing on the cake.
“The icing on the cake is that Nasir was the man mentioned in item 30 of PI Bala’s statutory declaration,” Raja Petra said in his column, Corridors of Power in the Malaysia Today news portal.The paragraph concerned reads:
“Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.”
'Aminah' was Altantuya
To recap, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri was one of the two policemen who were tried for the murder of Altantuya, a Mongolian woman who allegedly had an affair with Abdul Razak, a defence analyst from the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.
The other cop was Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar.
‘Aminah’ was a name used by Altantuya when she came to Malaysia to look for Abdul Razak, allegedly to demand her commission for assisting in a submarine deal in Paris. The sum she had reportedly asked for was US$500,000.
Among the claims that Bala made in his statutory declaration was that Altantuya told him several things about her relationship with Abdul Razak, including meeting him with (then deputy minister) Najib Abdul Razak in Singapore. She later met them at a dinner in Paris.
Bala claimed that the Mongolian woman also told him she was promised US$500,000 as commission for assisting in the submarine deal.
She allegedly told Bala about a house that Abdul Razak bought for her and about her mother who was sick and needed money for treatment.She had allegedly also told the private investigator that she and Abdul Razak had married in Korea.
Bala further claimed: “After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red Proton Aeroback arrived with a woman and two men.
“I now know the woman to be L/Cpl Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.
“ Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue Proton Saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The driver’s window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
“ Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red Proton and exchanged seats so that L/Cpl Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.”
'Yes, that man was Nasir'
Raja Petra is convinced the man driving the blue car was Nasir.
“Yes, that man in the blue Proton Saga was Nasir Safar.
“But the police, who took Bala’s statement, denied it and said that it was a resident from that area and not Nasir.
“How did the police know this immediately without any further investigation and without taking Nasir’s statement?
“Now, why would the Prime Minister’s special officer be at the scene of the crime? Was it to see for himself that Altantuya is arrested and quickly disposed off?” he asked.
“Yes, the plot thickens. First it was Najib’s ADC, Musa Safri. Then it was Rosmah’s ADC, Norhayati Hassan, and her husband, Abdul Aziz Buyong.
“And now we have Nasir Safar, who drove past Razak Baginda’s house very slowly, possibly to ensure that Altantuya, who was making a nuisance of herself, is picked up.”
Raja Petra asked: “Would Najib like to challenge us on this?“He can if he so wishes. Then, Bala’s lawyer can arrange for the witness to testify to the MACC (Malaysian AntiCorruption Commission) in London, as what they (Bala and lawyer) offered to d.
She worked as a translator
According to testimony in the trial of Abdul Razak, the murdered woman accompanied him to Paris at a time when Malaysia's Defence ministry was negotiating through a Malaysian company to buy two Scorpene submarines and a used Agosta submarine produced by the French government under a French-Spanish joint venture, Armaris.
Altantuya had reportedly worked as Abdul Razak’s translator when he was brokering for the Malaysian government
She went missing on Oct 19, 2006 and a report was lodged by her cousin,who also sought help from the Mongolian embassy in Bangkok.
The Malaysian police found fragments of bone, later verified as Altantuya’s , in forested land near the Subang Dam in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam.
Police investigation of her remains revealed that she was shot twice before C-4 explosives were used on her remains, although there has been later suggestion that the C-4 explosives may have killed her.
When her remains were found their identity could only be confirmed with DNA testing. The provenance of the C-4 remains unclear.
On Oct 31, 2008 the High Court acquitted Abdul Razak of abetment in the murder of Altantuya, with the prosecution saying they would appeal the acquittal.
However the Attorney General's office had decided not to file an appeal against Razak’s acquittal.
Verdict aftefr 159-day trial
On 14 Sept, 2009 Altantuya's father, Dr Shaariibuu Setev, withdrew his bid to force the A-G to appeal against Abdul Razak’s acquittal, after being advised that it would be a long, costly and difficult affair.[
Wrapping up the 159-day trial on April 9, 2009, High Court Judge Zaki Yasin ruled that Azilah and Sirul both guilty of murdering Altantuya and sentenced them to death.
In a statutory declaration in his sedition trial in June 2008, Raja Petra accused the PM’s wife, Rosmah Mansor of being one of three individuals who were present at the crime scene when Altantuya was murdered.
The two others allegedly present were her aide-de-camp Norhayati Hassan and her husband, Col Aziz Buyong.
Both the husband and wife are suing Raja Petra for defamation. His current whereabouts is unknown but he is believed to be abroad. - Malaysian Mirror
MB Perak: Zambry dari BN sah, kekal
TERKINI 1Oleh Debra Chong
PUTRAJAYA, Feb 9 — Penantian hampir setahun siapakah yang menerajui Perak sebagai Menteri Besar yang sah terjawab pagi tadi apabila keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan mengekalkan kedudukan Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir dari Barisan Nasional (BN).
Mahkamah Persekutuan mengisytiharkan Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah di sisi undang-undang.
Zambry dilantik sebagai menteri besar selepas BN memperoleh majoriti di Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) ekoran sokongan tiga wakil rakyat Pakatan Rakyat (PR) keluar parti masing-masing akhir Januari 2009.
Susulan itu pada 13 Feb tahun lalu, Datuk Seri Mohamad Nizar Jamaluddin mengambil tindakan undang-undang bagi mendapatkan perisytiharan bahawa beliau adalah Menteri Besar Perak yang sah dan memohon perintah mahkamah bagi menghalang Zambry daripada menunaikan tugas sebagai Menteri Besar.
Pada Mei 2009, Mahkamah Tinggi mengembalikan kedudukan Nizar sebagai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah, sebelum Mahkamah Rayuan mengubah keputusan itu dan mengisytiharkan bahawa pelantikan Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar Perak adalah sah mengikut perlembagaan.
Panel lima hakim diketuai Presiden Mahkamah Rayuan Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff membuat keputusan sebulat suara bahawa Sultan Azlan Shah telah menggunakan bidang kuasa baginda untuk melantik Zambry bagi menggantikan Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin daripada pakatan DAP-PAS-PKR setelah berpuas hati bahawa Nizar tidak lagi menikmati kelebihan undi dalam Dewan Undangan negeri.
Turut bersidang bersama Alauddin ialah Hakim Besar Malaya Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria serta hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan, Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin, Datuk Wira Ghazali Mohd Yusof dan Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong.
Penghakiman dibacakan oleh Hakim Arifin.
“Tiada peruntukan dalam perlembagaan negeri yang memerlukan undi tidak percaya dijalankan di dalam Dewan Undangan Negeri. Dalam kes semasa, adalah tidak meragukan yang Zambry mempunyai sokongan 31 daripada 59 anggota Dewan Undangan Negeri,” kata Hakim Arifin.
Pertikaian mengenai siapa antara Zambry dan Nizar adalah Menteri Besar yang sah timbul tahun lepas setelah BN mempunyai majoriti dalam dewan selepas dua anggota daripada PKR dan seorang daripada DAP meninggalkan parti masing-masing untuk menyokong Barisan Nasional, dan seorang lagi daripada PKR yang menyertai parti itu daripada Umno, bertindak kembali kepada Umno.
Sultan Azlan Shah kemudian menitahkan agar Nizar meletak jawatan sebagai Menteri Besar, dan pada Februari melantik Zambary sebagai Menteri Besar setelah berpuas hati bahawa BN mempunyai majoriti dalam dewan.
Nizar, 53, yang enggan meletak jawatan, mengambil tindakan undang-undang pada 13 Feb dengan memohon agar mahkamah mengisytiharkan beliau adalah Menteri Besar yang sah, dan pada 11 Mei, Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Datuk Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim mengembalikan jawatan itu kepada Nizar kerana mendapati bahawa BN tidak mengadakan undi tidak percaya terhadap Nizar dalam Dewan Undangan Negeri.
Bagaimanapun, ekoran rayuan Zambry, Mahkamah Rayuan mengisytiharkan bahawa pelantikan beliau sebagai Menteri Besar dibuat mengikut Perlembagaan
themalaysianinsider
Pada Mei 2009, Mahkamah Tinggi mengembalikan kedudukan Nizar sebagai Menteri Besar Perak yang sah, sebelum Mahkamah Rayuan mengubah keputusan itu dan mengisytiharkan bahawa pelantikan Zambry sebagai Menteri Besar Perak adalah sah mengikut perlembagaan.
Panel lima hakim diketuai Presiden Mahkamah Rayuan Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff membuat keputusan sebulat suara bahawa Sultan Azlan Shah telah menggunakan bidang kuasa baginda untuk melantik Zambry bagi menggantikan Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin daripada pakatan DAP-PAS-PKR setelah berpuas hati bahawa Nizar tidak lagi menikmati kelebihan undi dalam Dewan Undangan negeri.
Turut bersidang bersama Alauddin ialah Hakim Besar Malaya Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria serta hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan, Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin, Datuk Wira Ghazali Mohd Yusof dan Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong.
Penghakiman dibacakan oleh Hakim Arifin.
“Tiada peruntukan dalam perlembagaan negeri yang memerlukan undi tidak percaya dijalankan di dalam Dewan Undangan Negeri. Dalam kes semasa, adalah tidak meragukan yang Zambry mempunyai sokongan 31 daripada 59 anggota Dewan Undangan Negeri,” kata Hakim Arifin.
Pertikaian mengenai siapa antara Zambry dan Nizar adalah Menteri Besar yang sah timbul tahun lepas setelah BN mempunyai majoriti dalam dewan selepas dua anggota daripada PKR dan seorang daripada DAP meninggalkan parti masing-masing untuk menyokong Barisan Nasional, dan seorang lagi daripada PKR yang menyertai parti itu daripada Umno, bertindak kembali kepada Umno.
Sultan Azlan Shah kemudian menitahkan agar Nizar meletak jawatan sebagai Menteri Besar, dan pada Februari melantik Zambary sebagai Menteri Besar setelah berpuas hati bahawa BN mempunyai majoriti dalam dewan.
Nizar, 53, yang enggan meletak jawatan, mengambil tindakan undang-undang pada 13 Feb dengan memohon agar mahkamah mengisytiharkan beliau adalah Menteri Besar yang sah, dan pada 11 Mei, Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Datuk Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim mengembalikan jawatan itu kepada Nizar kerana mendapati bahawa BN tidak mengadakan undi tidak percaya terhadap Nizar dalam Dewan Undangan Negeri.
Bagaimanapun, ekoran rayuan Zambry, Mahkamah Rayuan mengisytiharkan bahawa pelantikan beliau sebagai Menteri Besar dibuat mengikut Perlembagaan
themalaysianinsider
Zambry diisytihar MB Perak yang sah
Hafiz YatimFeb 9, 10 11:11am
Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini sebulat suara memutuskan bahawa Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir dari BN adalah menteri besar Perak yang sah.
Presiden Mahkmah Rayuan, Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, mengetuai panel lima orang hakim yang mendengar kes tersebut.Yang lainnya ialah Hakim Besar Malaya, Tan Sri Arifin Zakaria dan Hakim Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin, Datuk Wira Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusoff dan Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong dari Mahkamah Persekutuan.
Keputusan penal hakim tersebut diumumkan oleh Arifin pada jam 11 pagi.
Istana Keadilan di Putrajaya, menjadi tumpuan sejak jam 7 pagi tadi apabila orang ramai beratur untuk mendapatkan pas masuk ke dewan mahkamah. Begitu juga penyokong BN dan Pakatan.
Pada 5 November lalu, Mahkamah Persekutuan telah mendengar rayuan Datuk Seri Mohamad Nizar Jamaluddin dan hujah para peguamnya selama enam jam, tetapi telah menangguhkan keputusannya.
Sebelum itu, mahkamah telah menolak permohonan Nizar supaya panel penuh 11 orang hakim atau tambahan bilangan panel hakim, untuk mendengar kesnya itu.
BN mengambil alih pentadbiran negeri Perak apabila tiga ADUN Pakatan rakyat keluar parti dan menjadi wakil rakyat bebas yang menyokong BN.
Berikutan itu, Pakatan telah membawa perkara itu ke mahkamah.
Pada 11 Mei, Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur, Datuk Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim telah memutuskan bahawa Nizar merupakan menteri besar Perak yang sah.Zambry kemudiannya membuat rayuan dan panel tiga hakim Mahkamah Rayuan sebulat suara menolak keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi itu, dengan alasan hakim berkenaan telah gagal untuk mengambilkira keseluruhan bukti yang dikemukakan.
Nizar diwakili oleh para peguam yang diketuai oleh peguam kanan Sulaiman Abdullah, manakala peguam kanan Cecil Abraham mewakili Zambry.
[Berita lanjut menyusul]
Rayuan Nizar ditolak
Nazri Abdullah
PUTRAJAYA, 9 Feb : Mahkamah Persekutuan menolak rayuan Datuk Seri Ir Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan yang mengisytiharkan pelantikan Datuk Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir sebagai Menteri Besar Perak adalah secara sah dan mengikut Perlembagaan.
Berikutan itu, Pengerusi DAP Perak, Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham menenangkan para penyokong Pakatan Rakyat dan meminta mereka bersabar.
"Kita hormati keputusan mahkamah," ujarnya.
Para penyokong Menteri Besar Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Perak, Datuk Seri Ir Mohammah Nizar Jamaluddin dan BN, Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir yang berkumpul di pekarangan Mahkamah Persekutuan di sini, mulai diasingkan jam 9.55 pagi.
Kira-kira jam 10.00 pagi kain rentang yang bertulis "Mahkamah rakyat, Nizar MB" dirampas oleh pihak keselamatan selepas direntang dan dilaungkan "Hidup Rakyat".
Walaupun suasana tenang, namun kira-kira 100 anggota pasukan Unit Simpanan Persekutuan (FRU) yang pada ditempatkan di dalam kawasan mahkamah mulai keluar untuk memisahkan kedua-dua belah pihak yang berjumlah kira-kira 1,000 orang.
Beberapa pemimpin Umno Perak berucap yang sebelum diminta beredar dari pintu masuk dan tangga mahkamah.
Antara pemimpin PAS yang mulai hadir ialah Naib Presiden, Datuk Mahfuz Omar kira-kira jam 9.40 pagi, Ketua Penerangan dan AJK PAS Pusat, Ustaz Idris Ahmad dan Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad sebentar tadi. Naib Presiden PKR, Mustafa Kamil Ayub juga kelihatan.
Penyokong PR turut menunaikan solat hajat di pekarangan mahkamah pada jam 9.30 pagi yang diimamkan oleh Ustaz Norazli Musa.
Para penyokong Menteri Besar Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Perak, Datuk Seri Ir Mohammah Nizar Jamaluddin dan BN, Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir mula berkumpul di pekarangan Mahkamah Persekutuan di sini, kira-kira kam 7.00 pagi tadi bagi mengikuti keputusan siapakah menteri besar yang sah.
Penyokong PR yang diketuai Kelab Penyokong PR Perak, Drs Khalil Idham Lim tidak dibenarkan memasuki mahkamah.
Begitu juga dengan penyokong Zambry yang memakai baju kuning bertulis Daulat Tuanku dan 1Malaysia serta Belia 4B dan Pewaris sambil melaungkan Daulat Tuanku dan 1Malaysia.
Hanya seorang wakil daripada setiap media dibenarkan masuk ke bangunan mahkamah manakala yang lain berkumpul di luar.
Sehingga jam 8.30 pagi, lebih 500 penyokong kedua-dua belah pihak memenuhi pekarangan mahkamah.
Empat buah bas yang membawa penyokong Nizar dari Perak juga sudah tiba.
(Berita lanjut menyusul)
PUTRAJAYA, 9 Feb : Mahkamah Persekutuan menolak rayuan Datuk Seri Ir Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan yang mengisytiharkan pelantikan Datuk Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir sebagai Menteri Besar Perak adalah secara sah dan mengikut Perlembagaan.
Berikutan itu, Pengerusi DAP Perak, Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham menenangkan para penyokong Pakatan Rakyat dan meminta mereka bersabar.
"Kita hormati keputusan mahkamah," ujarnya.
Para penyokong Menteri Besar Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Perak, Datuk Seri Ir Mohammah Nizar Jamaluddin dan BN, Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir yang berkumpul di pekarangan Mahkamah Persekutuan di sini, mulai diasingkan jam 9.55 pagi.Kira-kira jam 10.00 pagi kain rentang yang bertulis "Mahkamah rakyat, Nizar MB" dirampas oleh pihak keselamatan selepas direntang dan dilaungkan "Hidup Rakyat".
Walaupun suasana tenang, namun kira-kira 100 anggota pasukan Unit Simpanan Persekutuan (FRU) yang pada ditempatkan di dalam kawasan mahkamah mulai keluar untuk memisahkan kedua-dua belah pihak yang berjumlah kira-kira 1,000 orang.
Beberapa pemimpin Umno Perak berucap yang sebelum diminta beredar dari pintu masuk dan tangga mahkamah.
Antara pemimpin PAS yang mulai hadir ialah Naib Presiden, Datuk Mahfuz Omar kira-kira jam 9.40 pagi, Ketua Penerangan dan AJK PAS Pusat, Ustaz Idris Ahmad dan Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad sebentar tadi. Naib Presiden PKR, Mustafa Kamil Ayub juga kelihatan.Penyokong PR turut menunaikan solat hajat di pekarangan mahkamah pada jam 9.30 pagi yang diimamkan oleh Ustaz Norazli Musa.
Para penyokong Menteri Besar Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Perak, Datuk Seri Ir Mohammah Nizar Jamaluddin dan BN, Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir mula berkumpul di pekarangan Mahkamah Persekutuan di sini, kira-kira kam 7.00 pagi tadi bagi mengikuti keputusan siapakah menteri besar yang sah.
Penyokong PR yang diketuai Kelab Penyokong PR Perak, Drs Khalil Idham Lim tidak dibenarkan memasuki mahkamah.
Begitu juga dengan penyokong Zambry yang memakai baju kuning bertulis Daulat Tuanku dan 1Malaysia serta Belia 4B dan Pewaris sambil melaungkan Daulat Tuanku dan 1Malaysia.Hanya seorang wakil daripada setiap media dibenarkan masuk ke bangunan mahkamah manakala yang lain berkumpul di luar.
Sehingga jam 8.30 pagi, lebih 500 penyokong kedua-dua belah pihak memenuhi pekarangan mahkamah.
Empat buah bas yang membawa penyokong Nizar dari Perak juga sudah tiba.
(Berita lanjut menyusul)
Monday, February 8, 2010
Hina MB : PAS Gesa Ambil Tindakan Tegas Terhadap Penulis Blog
“ Bagi saya bahawa, mana-mana sekalipun yang terlibat dalam sektor media ini, tidak kiralah sama ada media arus perdana, media konvensional, atau media baru ini, mereka harus beretika, laporan yang diberikan mesti betul. Bukan kepada ilustrasi, emosi yang boleh menimbulkan kekecohan, di kalangan masyarakat kita ini. Jadi sewajarnya tindakan harus diambil kepada mereka"
Laporan polis yang dibuat PAS Kelantan terhadap blog yang menghina Menteri Besar Kelantan dengan memaparkan ilustrasi Tuan Guru Nik Aziz Nik Mat sedang “diliwat” oleh Ketua Umum PKR, harus dikenakan tindakan tegas.Naib Presiden PAS, Mahfuz Omar berkata, PAS Kelantan melakukan tindakan yang wajar dengan membuat laporan polis dan tindakan tegas harus dikenakan kepada penulis blog tersebut.
“ Laporan tersebut merupakan sesuatu yang sangat wajar untuk meminta polis secara agresif membanteras bahawa kita katakan sebagai satu jenayah untuk mengambil tindakan terhadap laporan-laporan yang tidak berasas yang mengaibkan dan boleh mencalarkan nama baik seseorang” kata Mahfuz.
Semalam laporan itu dibuat oleh Setiausaha Keselamatannya, Mejar (B) Mohamad Ibrahim di Ibu Pejabat Polis Kota Bharu, untuk menyiasat blogger yang menggunakan alamat maya jeffrydamien09.blogspot.com.
Blog tersebut, selain mempamerkan beberapa imej lucah menggunakan kaedah tindih gambar namun turut memuatkan artikel memburukkan dua tokoh itu.
“ Dan ternyata, laporan seperti itu yang disiarkan oleh blog tertentu adalah bertujuan berniat jahat untuk menjatuh dan mengaibkan Tuan Guru dan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim”
Mengulas tentang hak kebebasan media untuk melaporkan sesuatu berita, Mahfuz berkata, tiada halangan kepada media arus perdana mahu pun media baru untuk melapor dan meluahkan pandangan masing-masing namun ia haruslah bertunjang kepada rasa tanggungjawab dan maklumat yang tepat.
“ Bagi saya bahawa, mana-mana sekalipun yang terlibat dalam sektor media ini, tidak kiralah sama ada media arus perdana, media konvensional, atau media baru ini, mereka harus beretika, laporan yang diberikan mesti betul. Bukan kepada ilustrasi, emosi yang boleh menimbulkan kekecohan, di kalangan masyarakat kita ini. Jadi sewajarnya tindakan harus diambil kepada mereka" tambah Mahfuz lagi.
Hadir sama membuat laporan tersebut ialah Penasihat Undang-undang PAS Kelantan, Hisham Fauzi, exco Pemuda PAS negeri, Mohammad Abdul Rashid Yah dan 30 penyokong PAS.
PAS Kelantan menyifatkan perbuatan itu sebagai bersifat provokatif dan boleh menyebabkan ketidakstabilan politik dalam negara serta meminta siasatan segera dijalankan di bawah akta multimedia, akta fitnah dan Kanun Keseksaan.
tvSelangor
Anwar's trial : Application to disqualify judge
"You can see this in the trial with what was not supposedly said, but was reported. All we want is a fair and just trial,"The defence team in Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial has applied to disqualify the judge on grounds of 'bias'.
Outside the court, Anwar described the situation as "a political trial with the unfair use of the local media".
"You can see this in the trial with what was not supposedly said, but was reported. All we want is a fair and just trial," he said.
Anwar said the media had played up the complainant's testimony about the trousers, which implicated him.
malaysiakini
Anwar bimbang cara penghakiman kes liwat
Dzulfikar Mashoor
KUALA LUMPUR, 8 Feb: Ketua Umum Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim melahirkan rasa bimbang dengan cara penghakiman kes liwat yang melibatkannya.
"Saya bimbang proses itu tidak dapat menjamin keadilan,” jelasnya ketika ditemui wartawan di lobi Kompleks Mahkamah Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Duta di sini, pagi ini.
Sehubungan itu, beliau menasihatkan Hakim Mohamad Zabidin Md Diah dan pasukan pendakwaraya supaya bersikap adil dalam sesi penghujahan saksi utama kes liwat, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan yang sepatutnya berlangsung hari ini.
“Sepatutnya Tuan Hakim (Zabidin) kena dengar permohonan (peguam bela), bukan batalkan dan tutup perbicaraan peguam sebelum beliau membuat keputusan.
"Yang saya nak tekankan di sini, kita dah bersedia seperti peguam Karpal katakan, kita sebenarnya bersedia memulakan perbicaraan hari ini,” ujarnya yang juga Ketua Pembangkang.
Perbicaraan kes liwat beliau pagi tadi ditangguhkan ekoran pasukan peguam bela membuat permohon mengetepikan Mohamad Zabidin dari mendengar perbicaraan kes tersebut.
Permohonan tersebut dibuat oleh Karpal Singh apabila Mohamad Zabidin enggan mengenakan tindakan ke atas Utusan Malaysia yang menyiarkan beberapa butiran eksklusif mahkamah, termasuk gambar saksi utama Saiful Bukhari, 25, menunjukkan lokasi kes liwat di Kondominium Desa Damansara.
Selain menganggap hakim cuba bersikap bias dalam proses perbicaraan, Karpal turut mendakwa pasukan pendakwaraya yang diketuai oleh Peguamcara II Datuk Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abiden cuba menghalang pasukan peguam bela Anwar menyoal Saiful berkaitan lokasi-lokasi yang ditunjukkannya Jumaat lalu.
Karpal Singh turut menganggap Mohamad Zabidin tidak melaksanakan tanggungjawabnya kerana membiarkan Utusan Malaysia menghina mahkamah dengan mendedahkan beberapa butiran eksklusif berhubung kes itu.
Harakahdaily
KUALA LUMPUR, 8 Feb: Ketua Umum Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim melahirkan rasa bimbang dengan cara penghakiman kes liwat yang melibatkannya.
"Saya bimbang proses itu tidak dapat menjamin keadilan,” jelasnya ketika ditemui wartawan di lobi Kompleks Mahkamah Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Duta di sini, pagi ini.
Sehubungan itu, beliau menasihatkan Hakim Mohamad Zabidin Md Diah dan pasukan pendakwaraya supaya bersikap adil dalam sesi penghujahan saksi utama kes liwat, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan yang sepatutnya berlangsung hari ini.
“Sepatutnya Tuan Hakim (Zabidin) kena dengar permohonan (peguam bela), bukan batalkan dan tutup perbicaraan peguam sebelum beliau membuat keputusan.
"Yang saya nak tekankan di sini, kita dah bersedia seperti peguam Karpal katakan, kita sebenarnya bersedia memulakan perbicaraan hari ini,” ujarnya yang juga Ketua Pembangkang.
Perbicaraan kes liwat beliau pagi tadi ditangguhkan ekoran pasukan peguam bela membuat permohon mengetepikan Mohamad Zabidin dari mendengar perbicaraan kes tersebut.
Permohonan tersebut dibuat oleh Karpal Singh apabila Mohamad Zabidin enggan mengenakan tindakan ke atas Utusan Malaysia yang menyiarkan beberapa butiran eksklusif mahkamah, termasuk gambar saksi utama Saiful Bukhari, 25, menunjukkan lokasi kes liwat di Kondominium Desa Damansara.
Selain menganggap hakim cuba bersikap bias dalam proses perbicaraan, Karpal turut mendakwa pasukan pendakwaraya yang diketuai oleh Peguamcara II Datuk Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abiden cuba menghalang pasukan peguam bela Anwar menyoal Saiful berkaitan lokasi-lokasi yang ditunjukkannya Jumaat lalu.
Karpal Singh turut menganggap Mohamad Zabidin tidak melaksanakan tanggungjawabnya kerana membiarkan Utusan Malaysia menghina mahkamah dengan mendedahkan beberapa butiran eksklusif berhubung kes itu.
Harakahdaily
Fitnah II :“Ini peluru terakhir jet buruk Umno!” - Anwar Ibrahim
"Yang zalim ini sekarang pemimpin Melayu Umno, lalu kita mahu gantikan yang zalim ini dengan pimpinan Melayu yang baik, pemimpin Cina yang baik dan pemimpin India yang baik,"
Sunday, 07 February 2010 11:19 PM
Oleh Mohd Ali Bakri
KUALA LUMPUR : Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) melihat fitnah liwat yang dilemparkan terhadap beliau mutakhir ini adalah episod penipuan Umno yang terakhir sekali gus memerangkap parti itu sendiri.
"Mustahil mereka dapat menipu rakyat buat selamanya. Saya yakin, inilah episod penipuan mereka yang terakhir. Ini (fitnah) peluru terakhir jet buruk Umno," katanya ketika berceramah di depan para penyokong Pakatan Rakyat (PR) di sini, malam ini.
Anwar berkata, sikap Umno yang menyerang pimpinan PR mutakhir ini jelas ketara melibat penyusunan tipu helah yang tersusun.
"Mereka (Umno) serang habis-habisan Lim Guan Eng di Pulau Pinang, mereka serang Tuan Guru (Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat) di Kelantan, tidak ketinggalan juga isu-isu membabitkan Ustaz Azizan di Kedah.
"Tapi tak mengapa. Kita akan guna jet 'fighter' yang enjinnya tak hilang untuk serang mereka kembali," katanya disambut deraian ketawa hadirin.
Rencana mereka (Umno), tambah Anwar, dalam masa yang singkat, mahu meletakkan sampel DNA untuk mengelirukan pandangan umum.
"Saya harap mereka ini sentiasa ingat; Firaun yang lebih besar pun boleh tenggelam di lautan, Raja Shah di Iran pun boleh tumbang dan akhirnya melarikan diri dengan kapal terbang.
"Yang zalim ini sekarang pemimpin Melayu Umno, lalu kita mahu gantikan yang zalim ini dengan pimpinan Melayu yang baik, pemimpin Cina yang baik dan pemimpin India yang baik," kata Anwar.
Nota: Era Pakatan boleh dihubungi melalui 03-61850744 / 0745 (Tel.), 03-61850744 (Faks.), atau menerusi editor@erapakatan.com, editorpakatan@gmail.com (Mel-E).
Sunday, 07 February 2010 11:19 PM
Oleh Mohd Ali Bakri
KUALA LUMPUR : Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) melihat fitnah liwat yang dilemparkan terhadap beliau mutakhir ini adalah episod penipuan Umno yang terakhir sekali gus memerangkap parti itu sendiri.
"Mustahil mereka dapat menipu rakyat buat selamanya. Saya yakin, inilah episod penipuan mereka yang terakhir. Ini (fitnah) peluru terakhir jet buruk Umno," katanya ketika berceramah di depan para penyokong Pakatan Rakyat (PR) di sini, malam ini.
Anwar berkata, sikap Umno yang menyerang pimpinan PR mutakhir ini jelas ketara melibat penyusunan tipu helah yang tersusun.
"Mereka (Umno) serang habis-habisan Lim Guan Eng di Pulau Pinang, mereka serang Tuan Guru (Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat) di Kelantan, tidak ketinggalan juga isu-isu membabitkan Ustaz Azizan di Kedah.
"Tapi tak mengapa. Kita akan guna jet 'fighter' yang enjinnya tak hilang untuk serang mereka kembali," katanya disambut deraian ketawa hadirin.
Rencana mereka (Umno), tambah Anwar, dalam masa yang singkat, mahu meletakkan sampel DNA untuk mengelirukan pandangan umum.
"Saya harap mereka ini sentiasa ingat; Firaun yang lebih besar pun boleh tenggelam di lautan, Raja Shah di Iran pun boleh tumbang dan akhirnya melarikan diri dengan kapal terbang.
"Yang zalim ini sekarang pemimpin Melayu Umno, lalu kita mahu gantikan yang zalim ini dengan pimpinan Melayu yang baik, pemimpin Cina yang baik dan pemimpin India yang baik," kata Anwar.
Nota: Era Pakatan boleh dihubungi melalui 03-61850744 / 0745 (Tel.), 03-61850744 (Faks.), atau menerusi editor@erapakatan.com, editorpakatan@gmail.com (Mel-E).
Erdogan Minta Najib Hentikan Fitnah Keatas Anwar
Pengarah Strategik Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Tian Chua berkata antaranya adalah polisi tidak membenarkan selain Islam menggunakan kalimah Allah dan tindakan kerajaan mendakwa Penasihat PKR, Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan kes liwat.
Menurutnya, Perdana Menteri Turki, Recep Tayyip Erdogan telah menegur Najib terhadap kedua-dua perkara tersebut sewaktu bertemu di Timur Tengah baru-baru ini.
”Saya nak kongsi sedikit apa Tayyip Erdogan sebut ketika bertemu dengan Najib, ia tidak pernah didedahkan kepada umum,
”Tayyip bertanya kepada Najib apa yang sedang berlaku di Malaysia?,”kata Tian Chua ketika menyampaikan ucapan dalam program penerangan DUN Chukai.
Katanya, ketika itu terjadi peristiwa pembakaran gereja dan surau ekoran kontroversi penggunaan kalimah Allah.
”Najib kata….Oh… ini perkara sensitive, kalimah Allah tidak boleh digunakan oleh orang bukan Melayu,
”Tayyip Erdogan kata, nanti sekejap………anda orang Melayu, saya orang Turki tidak ada persamaan diantara awak dengan saya, selain daripada Islam, yang sama kalau boleh dipakai di Turki (mesti) boleh di pakai di Malaysia,”ujar Tian Chua lagi.
Katanya, Erdogan menegaskan kalau Najib tidak mahu berpegang dengan Islam tidak ada apa-apa hubungan antaranya dengan Erdogan, kerana kata Erdogan beliau berbangsa Turki dan Najib berbangsa Melayu.
Oleh kerana itu, kata Tian Chua, Erdogan menegaskan hubungan antara mereka adalah atas satu kalimah yang sama, iaitu Islam.
Justeru, kata Tian Chua, Erdogan berkata kepada Najib, di Turki orang-orang Kristian boleh menggunakan kalimah Allah, mengapa di Malaysia tidak berlaku demikian.
Berhubung dengan kes pendakwaan liwat terhadap Anwar, Tian Chua berkata, Erdogan meminta Najib menghentikan segala fitnah yang sedang berlaku.
Tian Chua berkata, menurut Erdogan, sikap dan tindakan politik yang sedang diambil oleh kerajaan Malaysia sedang memecahbelahkan dan meruntuhkan dunia Islam.
Ia adalah kerana, kata Tian Chua, Erdogan menganggap tindakan mendakwa dan menjatuhkan Anwar, seteru politik Najib, dengan fitnah skandal seks akan menjadikan umat Islam dipandang rendah dan akan ditindas.
”Erdogan bertanya kepada Najib, apa yang terjadi kepada Brother Anwar, Najib kata, oh…kali ini ada bukti terhadap Anwar dan mahkamah akan putuskan dan beliau (Najib) tidak campurtangan,”kata Tian Chua.
Namun menurut Tian, Erdogan berkata kepada Najib, supaya Najib jangan berbohong kerana menurut Erdogan beliau telah melihat bagaimana perjalanan mahkamah yang berlaku ketika fitnah yang sama terhadap Anwar sebelum ini.
BO
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Nik Aziz: Dialog dengan Umno hanya soal Islam
“PAS orang Melayu, bergerak atas nama Islam. Islam itu agama, bukan falsafah... bukan teori. Kenapa Umno tak boleh terima? Saya bersedia untuk bincang perkara itu dengan Umno pada bila-bila masa dan di mana saja tentang perkara ini. Hanya dalam topik itu sahaja, tidak lebih dari itu,”Oleh Mohd Zuharman
KOTA BARU, Feb 6 — Mursyidul Am PAS, Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat sekali lagi mengulangi kesediaan beliau untuk berdialog dengan Umno, tetapi ia hanya akan berkisar pada soal agama Islam.Sehubungan itu tegas Menteri Besar Kelantan, perbincangan tersebut hanya akan membabitkan kepada persoalan iaitu mengapa Umno tolak Islam dan PAS.
“PAS orang Melayu, bergerak atas nama Islam.
“Islam itu agama, bukan falsafah... bukan teori. Kenapa Umno tak boleh terima? Saya bersedia untuk bincang perkara itu dengan Umno pada bila-bila masa dan di mana saja tentang perkara ini.
“Hanya dalam topik itu sahaja, tidak lebih dari itu,” kata beliau pada sidang media selepas majlis pelancaran laman Facebook Tok Guru di sini petang ini.
Nik Aziz memberitahu tiga bulan lalu telah menghantar surat rasmi kepada Presiden Umno, Datuk Seri Najib Razak bagi tujuan perkara tersebut, namun sehingga kini tiada jawapan.
“Tiga bulan lepas saya dah kirim surat pada presiden Umno, tapi sampai sekarang tiada jawapan,” katanya.
Sebelum ini Nik Aziz pernah membuat kenyataan rela PAS dibubarkan untuk bersama Umno sekiranya parti itu sedia mengubah dasarnya kepada dasar Islam seperti mana yang dibawa PAS.
Sementara itu pada majlis yang sama beliau tidak menolak realiti alam siber seperti blog dan facebook mampu dimanfaatkan untuk menjalankan gerak kerja dakwah dengan menyalurkan maklumat yang benar kepada masyarakat.
“Tiap-tiap perkara atas muka dunia ini sifatnya bermuka dua, tinggal lagi sejauh mana kebijaksanaan kita menggunakan benda itu.
“Kalau guna ikut jalan salah, membuat fitnah, menyebar berita-berita palsu, berdosa. Begitulah sebaliknya.
“Atas kita, sebab akal yang diberi Allah Taala di antaranya ialah untuk memikir atau membentuk sesuatu perkara itu mengikut jalan kebaikan atau kejahatan,” katanya.
Pagi tadi, Najib meminta agar PAS lebih tegas dalam pendiriannya sebelum membuat tawaran untuk berbincang dengan Umno mengenai sebarang isu.
Najib yang juga Perdana Menteri berkata pendirian tegas PAS amat diperlukan sebelum sebarang keputusan dibuat kerana pengalaman sebelum ini membuktikan PAS tidak konsisten dan selalu berdolak-dalik dalam pendiriannya.
“Saya tak tau nak kata apa sebab pendirian dia (Mursyidul Am PAS yang juga Menteri Besar Kelantan Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat) ni bertukar macam cuaca, ada masa dia setuju, ada masa tak setuju, ada masa tutup, jadi saya tak tahu apa pendirian sebenarnya.
“Saya nak tunhgu pendirian yang tegas oleh PAS, jadi bila dia bersikap dolak-dalik ni susah nak cerita,” kata beliau.
themalaysianinsider
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)